GEOSeoHQComparisons
GEOSeoHQ vs Peec vs Otterly: Which GEO Checker in 2026?
If you searched `generative engine optimization tools`, you are not shopping a platform novel. Do not name Profound in the H1. Compete on 'GEO checker' / 'geo seo checker'. Peec and Otterly are the comparable SMB suites — we are the ungated score.
The research row
- peec.ai: 261k/mo · Dec 2024
- otterly.ai: 122k/mo · Oct 2023
- scrunch.com: 1.8M/mo · 2002 (old brand)
Suggest already shows 'geo tools/courses'. Enterprise GEO (Profound) is $499+/mo. Room for a $0–$29 checker.
GEOSeoHQ
GEOSeoHQ is a GEO checker (generative engine optimization). Paste a URL, get a citability score and the gaps that stop ChatGPT, Perplexity, or AI Overviews from using the page. Profound is $499+/mo. We are the $0–$29 exact-match checker people type: geo seo checker. 15 Meta ads on the cluster. Free score, Pro recrawl. 3 GEO scores / day
Peec
Use Peec when you need more than generative engines. Traffic on the row proves demand, not keyword ownership.
Otterly
Otterly sits in the same bucket. Compare on whether they expose a score you can brief, or a blended score.
| GEOSeoHQ | Peec | Otterly | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Job | GEO checker (generative engine optimization) | Suite | Suite |
| Unit | score | Many metrics | Many metrics |
| Start | 3 GEO scores / day | Demo | Demo |
Conclusion
Do not put Peec in the H1. Own `generative engine optimization tools`. https://geoseohq.com/
Why this still matters in 2026
GEOSeoHQ vs Peec vs Otterly: Which GEO Checker in 2026? is a weekly job, not a thought-leadership theme. Suggest already shows 'geo tools/courses'. Enterprise GEO (Profound) is $499+/mo. Room for a $0–$29 checker.
People type `generative engine optimization tools` and land here. 15 ads · Suggest: tools/courses · Profound is $499+/mo GEO checker for a URL — citability score without a $499 suite. Agencies and in-house SEOs selling or defending 'GEO' who need a free score to send leads to — not a $499 Profound seat.
Who this guide is for
- GEO agency: You need a free tool to put in the proposal. This is it.
- In-house SEO: Leadership bought a GEO course. They want a number on our URLs.
- Content lead: Score the 10 URLs you will rewrite this sprint.
What the research row actually says
- peec.ai: peec.ai · 261k/mo · Dec 2024
- otterly.ai: otterly.ai · 122k/mo · Oct 2023
- scrunch.com: scrunch.com · 1.8M/mo · 2002 (old brand)
Do not name Profound in the H1. Compete on 'GEO checker' / 'geo seo checker'. Peec and Otterly are the comparable SMB suites — we are the ungated score.
A worked example (steal this)
Use GEOSeoHQ the way the free tier is built: Score a URL for ChatGPT/Perplexity/AI Overview citability. You should leave with a score you can brief a human on — Citeable vs Gaps — and a timestamp.
- Start from the query they already type: `generative engine optimization tools`. Do not invent a demo universe.
- Run it in GEOSeoHQ. 3 GEO scores / day
- If the result is Gaps, write down who or what won instead. That list is the brief.
- Change one thing that matches how the category actually works. Re-run in 24–48 hours.
- If it pays, put it on a recrawl. $29/mo — 100 URLs, weekly recrawl, gap list across engines
How to judge a GEO checker in 2026
| Test | Pass | Fail |
|---|---|---|
| Unit | score you can explain in one sentence | A 40-metric heatmap with no row |
| First result | Ungated check before a demo | Login wall |
| Misses | Named Gaps with who won instead | Red badge with no names |
| Cadence | Recrawl + alert | Quarterly PDF |
| Incumbents | Peec / Otterly are the contrast | Cloning their brand in the H1 |
GEOSeoHQ is built to pass that table. Peec, Otterly, and Scrunch are the row's competitors — use them when you need their full suite. Do not buy a suite because you searched `generative engine optimization tools`.
Treat generative engines like uptime. Either you are Citeable, or you are Gaps, and you have a timestamp. Screenshots are not a system.
— Ops lead
Mistakes that waste a quarter
Tracking vanity instead of the money job
If it does not pay, alerts get muted. Start with the query on the research row.
Buying the incumbent because they have traffic
peec.ai · 261k/mo · Dec 2024 otterly.ai · 122k/mo · Oct 2023 scrunch.com · 1.8M/mo · 2002 (old brand) Traffic proves the category. It does not prove they own `generative engine optimization tools`.
One audit per quarter
generative engines moves. $29/mo — 100 URLs, weekly recrawl, gap list across engines
Skipping the competitor list
A Gaps with no names is a mood. Names are the brief.
What a report a human will read looks like
- Citeable / tracked, on a frozen set
- New Gaps rows with names
- Drops since last week
- What you changed and re-checked
What to do in the next 48 hours
- Run `generative engine optimization tools` in GEOSeoHQ at https://geoseohq.com/
- Write down Citeable vs Gaps and who won.
- Fix one thing. Re-run.
- Save it at /app if it pays.
Conclusion: keep GEOSeoHQ vs Peec boring on purpose
Score a URL for ChatGPT/Perplexity/AI Overview citability. GEOSeoHQ is built for that job. Free check on https://geoseohq.com/ — save at /app when you want history. peec.ai registered Dec 2024 (261k/mo) otterly.ai Oct 2023 (122k/mo) Profound is $499+/mo
Frequently asked questions
What is a GEO checker?
A GEO checker scores a URL for generative engine optimization — how citeable the page is in AI answers. GEOSeoHQ is that tool.
Is this Profound?
No. Profound is enterprise GEO at $499+/mo. This is a URL checker.
Is there a free GEO checker?
Yes. Three scores a day. Pro is recrawl and more URLs.
GEO vs AEO?
Sister terms. This product is GEO. AnswEngine is AEO if you bought that domain too.